<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wikidot="http://www.wikidot.com/rss-namespace">

	<channel>
		<title>MAC</title>
		<link>http://tau-foc-f19.wikidot.com/forum/t-12997569/mac</link>
		<description>Posts in the discussion thread &quot;MAC&quot;</description>
				<copyright></copyright>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 04:41:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		
					<item>
				<guid>http://tau-foc-f19.wikidot.com/forum/t-12997569#post-4485208</guid>
				<title>(no title)</title>
				<link>http://tau-foc-f19.wikidot.com/forum/t-12997569/mac#post-4485208</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2020 16:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>nbitansky</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>1746223</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>MACs are indeed not guaranteed to be pseudorandom.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://tau-foc-f19.wikidot.com/forum/t-12997569#post-4484722</guid>
				<title>(no title)</title>
				<link>http://tau-foc-f19.wikidot.com/forum/t-12997569/mac#post-4484722</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2020 08:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Amit</wikidot:authorName>								<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>I thought of the following counter example, LMK if it works:<br /> You can add 0 in the beginning of every signature of a valid MAC. I guess it will not harm the unforgeability, but it will definitely be distinguishable.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://tau-foc-f19.wikidot.com/forum/t-12997569#post-4484715</guid>
				<title>MAC</title>
				<link>http://tau-foc-f19.wikidot.com/forum/t-12997569/mac#post-4484715</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2020 08:26:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Amit</wikidot:authorName>								<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>If we have a MAC with authorization algorithm AUTH, does the following must be computationally indistinguishable?<br /> 1. U_n, Auth_sk(U_n)<br /> 2. U_n, (U_n)^'</p> <p>Basically the question is does the fact that the adversary cannot forge a signature to a new message means that he cannot tell when the signature is correct?<br /> Thanks!</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
				</channel>
</rss>